A4: Is there a potential role for advanced fusion fuels? If so, what is that role and how might it be exploited?

I. Context

The great majority of fusion reactor studies are based on the deuterium/tritium (D-T) fuel cycle through the reaction t(d,n)a. This reaction is chosen because it has the largest fusion cross-section (peaking at about 5 barns) and reaches this maximum cross-section at the lowest energy (~65 keV in the center-of-mass) of any potential fusion fuel. This large cross-section and low center-of-mass energy lead to the lowest confinement requirement for ignition (ignition in D-T requires a confinement triple-product ntET=4.9´1021 keV-s/m-3 in the presence of a plausible impurity mix) and the highest fusion power density at fixed plasma pressure. The D-T fuel cycle also presents unique challenges to reactor designers. Two particular issues are the 14 MeV neutrons produced in the t(d,n)a reaction, and the presence of tritium in the fuel cycle. The 14 MeV neutrons damage reactor components (principally the structure of the blanket and shield) thereby limiting their useful lifetime; and activate materials, thereby opening the possibility that D-T fusion reactors will produce large volumes of radioactive wastes. Tritium does not occur in nature, but must be bred through the reaction n(6Li,t)a in a breeding blanket which surrounds the plasma. In situ breeding of tritium can result in large on-site tritium inventories (principally in the blanket and tritium recovery system) raising both safety and nuclear proliferation concerns.

 

II. Advanced Fuel Cycles

Alternative ("advanced") fuel cycles have also been under investigation for many years. Two considerations have motivated these investigations are:

(i) Removing tritium from the fuel cycle in order to simplify the fuel cycle (no tritium breeding), to expand the available fuel supply (the earth’s lithium supply limits the ultimate amount of tritium which might be produced by breeding blankets), and/or to address nuclear proliferation concerns.

(ii) Eliminating (or greatly reducing) neutron production in fusion reactors as a means of avoiding (or greatly ameliorating) neutron damage to, and activation of fusion reactor components.

The three most common advanced fuel cycles are D-3He [which features the reaction 3He(d,p)a], "catalyzed DD" [that is, a primary cycle involving the two reactions d(d,n)3He and d(d,p)t together with the secondary reactions t(d,n)a and 3He(d,p)a to consume all t and 3He produced by the primary reactions], and p-11B [which features the reaction 11B(p,a)2a]

The D-3He fuel cycle has the advantage that it produces fewer neutrons than does the D-T fuel cycle. While the principle reaction 3He(d,p)a is aneutronic, neutron production via the side reaction d(d,n)3He and the secondary reaction d(t,n)a is unavoidable. The neutrons produced mainly have lower energy [2.45 MeV neutrons from d(d,n)3He reactions as opposed to 14 MeV neutrons from d(t,n)a reactions] so that material damage is reduced relative to the DT fuel cycle. Reactor studies show that the D-3He fuel cycle largely solves the reactor component lifetime issues associated with neutron damage, while neutron activation and the associated production of radioactive waste remains a concern. The D-3He fuel cycle avoids tritium, but does this by replacing it with another exotic isotope, 3He. 3He does not occur on earth in sufficient quantities to support a fusion power industry. However, 3He can be found on the moon, and proponents of the D-3He fuel cycle have suggested that it may be economic to mine 3He on the moon and transport it to earth to fuel a fusion power industry. The D-3He fuel cycle has a higher confinement requirement for ignition (ignition in D-3He requires a confinement triple-product ntET=2.4´1023 keV-s/m-3 in the presence of a plausible impurity mix), and a lower fusion power density at fixed plasma pressure.

The Catalyzed D-D fuel cycle avoids tritium without introducing any exotic isotopes, and thereby holds out the promise of an essentially unlimited supply of fuel for fusion power generation. The catalyzed D-D cycle actually produces more neutrons per unit of fusion power produced than the D-T cycle so that this fuel cycle does not address materials damage and activation concerns. The catalyzed D-D fuel cycle has a still higher confinement requirement for ignition (ignition in catalyzed D-D requires a confinement triple-product ntET=1.1´1023 keV-s/m-3 in the absence of impurities. Ignition in catalyzed DD cannot be achieved with a plausible impurity mix) and still lower fusion power density at fixed plasma pressure.

The p11B fuel cycle avoids exotic isotopes, so that no breeding of fuel is required and the potential fuel supply is essentially unlimited. It is also nearly aneutronic, thus addressing materials damage and much of the materials activation concern. However, there are residual activation issues associated with high energy g-rays produced via the reaction 11B(p,g)12C, and with neutron production from the reactions 11B(a,n)14N and 11B(p,n)11C; and safety concerns associated with possible equilibrium inventories of MCi/GW of 11C. More fundamentally, there is the problem that the p-11B fusion reactivity is too low to compete with bremsstrahlung radiation losses, so that ignition (or even high fusion gain) cannot be achieved with this fuel.

 

III. R&D Issues

Three key issues must be addressed if advanced fuels are to become a practical fuel for fusion reaction systems:

1) Substantial advances must be made in energy confinement so that we can reasonably contemplate devices with confinement triple-products in excess of 2.4´1023 keV-s/m-3.

2) Advances must be made in impurity exhaust to insure that we can successfully remove the a-ash in systems with much better thermal confinement.

3) At the high operating temperatures required for advanced fuels it will be necessary to operate at high-b to control synchrotron radiation losses. Hence, long-pulse operation at high-b (and excellent thermal confinement) must be demonstrated.